This topic applies to people who were eligible for DSP prior to 11 May 2005 (30 hour rule) and transitional (1.1.T.147) DSP recipients.
Assessment of continuing ability to work for recipients who become eligible to receive DSP after 30 June 2006 and those whose start date on DSP is between 11 May 2005 and 30 June 2006 and reviewed after 30 June 2006 under the 15 hour rule, see 3.6.2.112.
Policy reference: SS Guide 3.6.1.12 Qualification for DSP - 15 Hour Rule, 3.6.1.10 Qualification for DSP - 30 Hour Rule
To qualify for DSP, an applicant must have an impairment rating of at least 20 points under the impairment tables AND have a CITW (1.1.C.330). BOTH ASPECTS ARE OF EQUAL IMPORTANCE.
Explanation: It does not necessarily follow that an applicant who meets the 20 point threshold is incapable of working. It does mean that their medical impairment/s are severe enough to cause significant difficulties in many work situations, but depending on their individual circumstances, coping mechanisms, training, and reasonable adjustments, the applicant may be able to sustain full-time employment.
Act reference: SSAct section 94 Qualification for DSP
Policy reference: SS Guide 3.6.1.10 Qualification for DSP - 30 Hour Rule, 3.6.1.12 Qualification for DSP - 15 Hour Rule
For the purposes of DSP, a CITW means an inability to work or be re-skilled for work within the next 2 years because of a disability.
'Work' means work:
For the meaning please refer to 1.1.R.133.
Note: People participating in the SWS are considered to have a CITW.
The factors to be considered when determining whether the application has a CITW are:
The following factors are NOT to be considered in the assessment:
If the applicant has difficulty with literacy, numeracy or language and these difficulties are not directly attributable to their medical condition, this CANNOT be considered to contribute to the applicant's inability to do work or training.
The delegate must consider the impact of the medical condition on their potential to undertake training which would assist in acquiring such skills. Other non-medical influences, which prevent these skills from being acquired should not be taken into account.
Centrelink service officers need to identify any recent changes in the applicant's circumstances, which have led them to claim DSP. This may provide useful information about an applicant's CITW. It is important to identify any non-medical reasons for the person's decision to claim DSP as these may indicate that the applicant does not have a CITW.
Example: The following are examples of non-medical reasons that may be the impetus for a new DSP claim:
If the Centrelink service officer determines that the applicant is unable to do their usual work or work for which they are currently skilled due to their impairment, the likelihood of educational, vocational or on-the-job training enabling the applicant to work MUST be considered when assessing CITW. This training is detailed in the linked policy reference below.
Policy reference: SS Guide 3.6.1.10 Qualification for DSP - 30 Hour Rule, 3.6.1.12 Qualification for DSP - 15 Hour Rule, 3.6.2.130 DSP Assessment of Ability to Undertake Training - 30 Hour Rule, 3.6.2.140 DSP Claimants Aged 55 Years or More
_______________________________________________________
Last reviewed: 7 September 2009